Can the public site expose changing research judgment without becoming a second fact system?
Test whether an article-centered index of Projects and active Questions improves understanding without duplicating repository truth.
01 / Current position
A hypothesis is not the current judgment.
The dossier preserves the live research position. Dated articles preserve the complete evidence and argument that changed it.
Stable Project ownership, durable Question dossiers, dated Articles, and a few curated architecture views can expose changing judgment while detailed evidence remains in publications and owning repositories.
Answered after contraction. The full Experiment/Finding/Decision/Event graph and explicit relation registry were removed. Project, Question, and Article metadata now drive Research, Writing, Current, article context, and curated System views with substantially less duplicate state.
02 / Decision boundary
What keeps this Question alive?
A static project directory hides why boundaries changed and what remains unresolved, but a complete public knowledge graph creates another mutable registry that can drift from articles and repositories.
Use the article-centered interface during real publication work and observe whether Question dossiers, topic browsing, and source links reduce explanation cost for first-time and returning readers.
If Project, Question, and Article metadata cannot support navigation without repeated manual exceptions, add only the narrow missing relation—not a general public graph.
03 / Supporting publications
Complete arguments connected to this Question.
1 dated publication currently document this research line.
04 / Source discipline
The dossier is an index, not the evidence authority.
Owns the current judgment, next test, and deletion condition.
Own complete dated arguments, limitations, comparisons, and source links.
Own exact code, tests, releases, receipts, and machine evidence.