Did a shared World Interaction improve correlated external recovery?
Record the negative result that direct owner-local integration carried the tested external recovery responsibilities.
01 / Current position
A hypothesis is not the current judgment.
The dossier preserves the live research position. Dated articles preserve the complete evidence and argument that changed it.
A shared World identity would be necessary to bind path and Provider execution across response loss.
Answered negatively. W1 and subsequent experiments did not justify a shared World authority; the active repository retains Provider-native and machine-local capabilities only.
02 / Decision boundary
What keeps this Question alive?
A shared layer should exist only if it prevents a reproduced failure more cleanly than Provider-native receipts, Host state, and Runtime correlation.
Keep the question closed unless a new external workload reproduces an unowned failure that direct integration cannot reconcile.
A new workload repeatedly loses necessary continuity despite Provider-native receipts, Host correlation, Runtime evidence, and machine-local observation.
03 / Supporting publications
Complete arguments connected to this Question.
0 dated publications currently document this research line.
04 / Source discipline
The dossier is an index, not the evidence authority.
Owns the current judgment, next test, and deletion condition.
Own complete dated arguments, limitations, comparisons, and source links.
Own exact code, tests, releases, receipts, and machine evidence.